'Twiqbal' vs. 1400 Asbestos Plainitffs

“Twiqbal” has become a very real creature – one born of two cases involving federal pleading standards: Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal.  Just the mention of Twiqbal sends shivers down plaintiffs lawyers’ spines while at the same time comforting defense lawyers in a way akin to drinking a warm glass of milk before bedtime. 

Pencil Rendering of What "Twiqbal" Might Look LikeYesterday, however, in In re Asbestos Litigation, the mighty Twiqbal took a two-by-four to the back of its head when the Eastern Division of Pennsylvania summarily denied a motion to dismiss 1,400 suits alleging asbestos related injuries.  Thomas v. American Standard, Inc. et al. USDC ED PA 2:06-cv-60935.  How much did the denial hurt the mighty Twiqbal?  Probably not that much given there was no opinion or reasoning offered by the court - but it has to sting.

Comments (1)

Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the end
ta fency - July 7, 2011 7:35 PM

Nice topics.....thank you for providing with a lot of valuable information.....
Asbestos Removalists Perth

Post a comment

Fill out this form to add a comment to the discussion
I'd like to leave a comment. is
,
is
,
is
is